data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d207/7d2078aefafa163e91bed9f005f828217537c058" alt=""
Hollywood seems to think the law should leave him alone. The far right media is tearing him up. Foxboy Sean Hannity has REALLY been indignant, acting as if he knows the score. Says Polanski raped and sodomized a little girl after "pumping her full of drugs." Seems to be getting out of hand. Veteran newswoman Cokie Roberts says he should be killed. Polanski, not Hannity.
Anyone interested in a little Clarity here?
---------
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/514ca/514cab6804b73ae5da975278b30387a238c195ae" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a5ce/5a5ce64c2c1f929f4bb36d00a2679c08a14f475d" alt=""
Then the Charles Manson death fiends from hell descended on the house and killed everyone that night. The rest is history. (Coincidentally to this post, Susan Atkins, one of the Manson fiends that night who actually did the stabbing of Sharon Tate Polanski and her unborn baby, died a few days ago [September 25] in prison of brain cancer. This wouldn't have happened had Susan been imprisoned in Scotland.)
In 1977, Roman Polanski met a young (aspiring) model at actor Jack Nicholson's house, for a photo shoot, while Nicholson was away. Nicholson and Polanski were friends. During the course of the evening, he took pictures, gave her champagne and a quaalude. He became aware that she was only 13 years old but didn't stop. Her mother was aware she was there with the great director. Not sure if taking a quaalude is the same as "pumping her full of drugs", but he sure did give her one. And even if he didn't know her correct age, he knew she wasn't 18.
I'm not saying she participated, or cooperated. She didn't want it to happen. Doesn't matter. California law said she wasn't qualified from an age standpoint to give informed consent. Statutory rape. Often those things are worked out without going to prison. Money. Probation. Not this time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d927/6d927631ff79314d08d66a2dca47cfc7084814cd" alt=""
My opinion? He needs to spend some time in jail, if only for the running away part. The girl, now 30-some years older, couldn't care less. Again, doesn't matter. The victim in the eyes of the law is "The People of California," not the girl. The girl doesn't have to "press charges." Same like in any crime.
Most of the Hollywood establishment have their sensibilities pretty offended, that one of their own, of such artistic bent (who has probably suffered much already from being forced to live in France all these years) should be called to account like a common criminal.
Oh. He IS a common criminal.
2 comments:
I couldn't care less what movies he's made (I'm not fond of any of his movies to date, but, if I thought he was the Mozart of filmmaking, I don't think I'd feel differently).
He is a criminal and no one should be above the law. The fact that some are allowed to be doesn't excuse it.
Does that mean I agree with you AGAIN? I'm starting to get worried.
Too much agreeing lately. Scary. :)
Post a Comment